Studies documenting the effectiveness of LST have been funded by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC); the National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA); the National Cancer Institute (NCI); the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute (NHLBI); and the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD).
Williams, C., Griffin, K. W., Botvin, C., Sousa, S. & Botvin, G. J. (2023). Effectiveness of digital health tools to prevent bullying among middle school students when combined with a cognitive-behavioral skills training classroom program. Adolescents 3(1), 110-130.
This study tested the effectiveness of the Life Skills Training intervention which included the classroom curriculum, an animated video game, and e-learning modules for teachers and parents to prevent bullying behavior among middle school students. Fourteen schools were randomly assigned to receive enhanced LST(intervention group) or standard LST material without any bullying materials (comparison group). Students in both groups completed online pre- and post-test surveys to assess bullying behavior, knowledge, and life skills. Among students in the intervention group, there were significant reductions in in-person and cyberbullying perpetration and increased levels of life skills knowledge relative to students in the comparison group. This study is among the first to demonstrate that an intervention originally designed to prevent substance use and violence can also substantially reduce bullying when combined with digital health tools including a video game and e-learning modules.
Griffin, K. W., Botvin, G. J., Scheier, L. M., & Williams, C. (2023). Long-term behavioral effects of a school-based prevention program on illicit drug use among young adults. Journal of Public Health Research., 12(1), 1-5.
In the present study, middle schools were randomly assigned to receive the LifeSkills Training program or to serve as a “treatment-as-usual” control group. All students (n = 2,042) completed pre-test, post-test, and long-term follow-up surveys. Analysis revealed that compared to students assigned to the control group, those who received LST showed significantly less overall lifetime illicit drug use, as well as lifetime marijuana use, marijuana intoxication, and lifetime non-medical pill use 13 years after they originally received the program. This study provides evidence that not only does the LifeSkills Training program have immediate effects on substance use, but that the effects are long-term and durable.
Griffin KW, Williams C, Botvin CM, Sousa S and Botvin GJ (2022). Effectiveness of a hybrid digital substance abuse prevention approach combining e-Learning and in-person class sessions. Front. Digit. Health 4:931276.
The current study included 1,447 students from 23 middle schools across the United States. Schools were randomly assigned to receive the e-learning program and class sessions or serve as a “treatment-as-usual” control group. Compared to controls, students who received the e-learning program and class sessions showed significantly less cigarette smoking, e-cigarette and vaping use, excess alcohol use, marijuana use, and prescription drug misuse. They also showed increased health knowledge and skills knowledge, increased decision-making skills, increased skills related to coping with anxiety and anger, more effective communication and social skills, and increased conflict resolution and assertiveness skills.
Williams, C., Griffin, K.W., Mehta, R.K. & Botvin, G.J. (2021).Testing an evidence-based drug abuse and violence preventive approach adapted for youth in juvenile justice diversionary settings.. Health Justice 9, 3.
Griffin, K.W., Williams, C., Travis, W., & Tharp, A. (2021). Prevention of Unwanted Sexual Contact Among Cadets at the United States Air Force Academy: A Brief Small-Group Intervention. American Journal of Public Health.
Velasco V., Griffin, K.W., Botvin, G.J., and Corrado Celata and Gruppo LST Lombardia. (2017). Preventing Adolescent Substance Use Through an Evidence-Based Program: Effects of the Italian Adaptation of Life Skills Training. Prevention Science.
Botvin, G.J., Griffin, K.W., Williams, C. (2015). Preventing Daily Substance Use among High School Students Using a Cognitive-Behavioral Competence Enhancement Approach. World Journal of Preventive Medicine, 3(3):48-53.
The present study tested the effectiveness of a substance abuse prevention program for deterring tobacco, alcohol, and marijuana use among high school students. The prevention program teaches social resistance skills and general personal and social competence skills. Rates of substance use behavior were examined among students (N = 452) from 12 public high schools that were randomly assigned to either receive the prevention program (5 schools, n = 196) or serve as a treatment-as-usual control group (7 schools, n = 256). The impact of the prevention program was tested using composite indicators of daily substance use based on items measuring the frequency of smoking, drinking, drunkenness, marijuana use, and marijuana intoxication. Data were analyzed using generalized estimating equations to adjust for school-level clustering. Comparison of the posttest adjusted means (controlling for school clustering, gender, race/ethnicity, and family structure) revealed that the intervention produced significant prevention effects on daily substance use, both in terms of a daily polysubstance use index and the proportion of daily substance users across experimental condition. Findings indicated that there were 52% fewer daily substance users in the intervention condition compared to controls. Conclusions drawn from this study are that: (1) daily substance use can be prevented in high school students using a competence enhancement approach that addresses key risk and protective factors; (2) prevention approaches that are effective for middle school students can also be effective for high school students, if adapted to be developmentally appropriate; and (3) universal prevention approaches delivered by classroom teachers with minimal specialized training offer the potential for widespread dissemination and a cost-effective approach to an important public health problem.
Crowley, D., Jones, D. E., Coffman, D. L., Greenberg, M.T. (2014). Can We Build an Efficient Response to the Prescription Drug Abuse Epidemic? Assessing the Cost Effectiveness of Universal Prevention in the PROSPER Trial. Preventive Medicine.
Spoth, R., Trudeau, L., Redmond, C., Shin, C. (2014). Replication RCT of early universal prevention effects on young adult substance misuse. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 82(6):949-963.
Objective
For many substances, more frequent and problematic use occurs in young adulthood; these types of use are predicted by the timing of initiation during adolescence. We replicated and extended an earlier study examining whether delayed substance initiation during adolescence, resulting from universal preventive interventions implemented in middle school, reduces problematic use in young adulthood.
Method
Participants were middle school students from 36 Iowa schools randomly assigned to the Strengthening Families Program plus Life Skills Training (SFP 10–14 + LST), LST-only, or a control condition. Self-report questionnaires were collected at 11 time points, including four during young adulthood. The intercept (average level) and rate of change (slope) in young adult frequency measures (drunkenness, alcohol-related problems, cigarettes, and illicit drugs) across ages 19–22 were modeled as outcomes influenced by growth factors describing substance initiation during adolescence. Analyses entailed testing a two-step hierarchical latent growth curve model; models included the effects of baseline risk, intervention condition assignment, and their interaction.
Results
Analyses showed significant indirect intervention effects on the average levels of all young adult outcomes, through effects on adolescent substance initiation growth factors, along with intervention by risk interaction effects favoring the higher-risk subsample. Additional direct effects on young adult use were observed in some cases. Relative reduction rates were larger for the higher-risk subsample at age 22, ranging from 5.8% to 36.4% on outcomes showing significant intervention effects.
Conclusions
Universal preventive interventions implemented during early adolescence have the potential to decrease the rates of substance use and associated problems, into young adulthood.